Skip to main content
alam.amiki@gmail.com 6281260272238
Register
Articles

Analysis of the Effects of Risk Management and Knowledge Sharing on Supervisory Effectiveness

  • 1*,2,3,4,5,6 Universitas Ciputra.

* Corresponding Author: Adrie Oktavio

Open Access
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v6i2.765
Published
Pages
344–351

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)

Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER)
June

Abstract

This study examines the effect of risk management and knowledge sharing on supervisory effectiveness at PT Ungaran Sari Garment III, Pringapus 7 Unit. A quantitative approach was applied using data collected from 100 employees selected through a structured sampling technique. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with a significance level of 5 percent. The findings show that risk management has a positive and significant effect on supervisory effectiveness, indicating that well-implemented risk identification, assessment, and control procedures support more effective supervision. Knowledge sharing also demonstrates a positive and significant influence, suggesting that the exchange of experience, skills, and work-related information among employees contributes to better coordination and monitoring processes. Simultaneously, both variables strengthen supervisory effectiveness, as reflected in the coefficient of determination (R²) of 51.9 percent, while the remaining variance is explained by other factors not examined in this study. These results are consistent with enterprise risk management and knowledge management perspectives, which emphasize alignment between organizational systems and employee interaction in achieving effective supervision.

Keywords

Risk Management Knowledge Sharing Supervisory Effectiveness Enterprise Risk Management Knowledge Management

How to Cite

Oktavio, A., Wijaya, V., Soediro, M., Nugroho, A., Adityaji, R., & Kusumawidjaya, E. (2026). Analysis of the Effects of Risk Management and Knowledge Sharing on Supervisory Effectiveness. Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER), 6(2), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v6i2.765

References

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management systems: Issues, challenges, and benefits. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.
  • Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(7), 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003
  • Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023
  • Beasley, M. S., Clune, R., & Hermanson, D. R. (2005). Enterprise risk management: An empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(6), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.10.001
  • Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148669
  • Cabrera, Á., & Cabrera, E. F. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020
  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (2017). Enterprise risk management: Integrating with strategy and performance. COSO.
  • Florio, C., & Leoni, G. (2017). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case. The British Accounting Review, 49(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003
  • Florio, C., & Leoni, G. (2017). Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case. The British Accounting Review, 49(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2016.08.003
  • Hopkin, P. (2018). Fundamentals of risk management: Understanding, evaluating and implementing effective risk management (5th ed.). Kogan Page.
  • Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045756
  • Mardiasmo, M. B. A. (2021). Akuntansi sektor publik-edisi terbaru. Penerbit Andi.
  • Nonaka, I. (2009). The knowledge-creating company. In The economic impact of knowledge (pp. 175-187). Routledge.
  • Porter Michael, E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73-93.
  • Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human resource management review, 20(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.10.001

Author Biographies

  • Adrie Oktavio, Universitas Ciputra.

    Tourism Study Program, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya City, East Java Province, Indonesia.

  • Verina Wijaya, Universitas Ciputra.

    Tourism Study Program, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya City, East Java Province, Indonesia.

  • Moses Soediro, Universitas Ciputra.

    Tourism Study Program, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya City, East Java Province, Indonesia.

  • Agustinus Nugroho, Universitas Ciputra.

    Tourism Study Program, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya City, East Java Province, Indonesia.

  • Rizki Adityaji, Universitas Ciputra.

    Tourism Study Program, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya City, East Java Province, Indonesia.

  • Erris Kusumawidjaya, Universitas Ciputra.

    Tourism Study Program, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya City, East Java Province, Indonesia.

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Adrie Oktavio, Verina Wijaya, Moses Soediro, Agustinus Nugroho, Rizki Adityaji, Erris Kusumawidjaya

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This is an open-access journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Under this license, you are free to:

  • Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Attribution Requirements:
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Copyright and Retention:
Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

Usage Statistics