Skip to main content
alam.amiki@gmail.com 6281260272238
Register
Articles

Poverty and Its Mitigation Efforts in Aceh Province during the 2020–2024 Period

  • 1* Universitas Serambi Mekkah
  • 2 Universitas Syiah Kuala

* Corresponding Author: Zainuddin Zainuddin

Open Access
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v5i2.603
Published
Pages
258-265

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025)

Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER)
October

Abstract

The aim of this study is to provide information on the presence of the poor population in Aceh Province and to evaluate whether the poverty alleviation programs implemented by the Aceh government have had an impact on reducing poverty rates in the province. This research adopts a descriptive qualitative approach, collecting data through observation from the official websites of the government and the Aceh Provincial Statistics Agency concerning the number of poor people and poverty alleviation programs. During the observation period, it was found that there was a significant increase in the number of poor people from 2020 to 2021, which rose by 19,330 individuals, resulting in a total of 834,240 poor people in 2021, or 15.33% of the total population of Aceh Province. However, a significant decline occurred from 2021 to 2022, with a reduction of 27,420 individuals, bringing the number of poor people in 2022 to 806,820. This indicates the success of the poverty alleviation programs, both from the central government and the local government. Nevertheless, the decrease in poverty slowed down considerably from 2022 to 2023, with a mere reduction of 70 individuals, suggesting that the poverty alleviation efforts were less successful, leaving the total number of poor people in 2023 at 806,750. Furthermore, between 2023 and 2024, there was a more substantial decrease in poverty, with a reduction of 2,220 individuals, bringing the total number of poor people to 804,530 by 2024. Therefore, it can be concluded that poverty alleviation in Aceh Province from 2021 to 2022 was relatively successful, from 2022 to 2023 was unsuccessful, and from 2023 to 2024 showed improvement. However, overall, poverty alleviation has not been effective, as the poverty rate in 2024 remains at 14.23% of the total population. Ideally, the poverty rate should be below 8%. Therefore, it is crucial for stakeholders in Aceh Province to design effective and efficient poverty alleviation programs to achieve an ideal poverty rate of ≤ 8% of the total population.

Keywords

Poverty Distribution Poverty Alleviation Poverty Increase Poverty Reduction

How to Cite

Zainuddin, Z., & T. Makmur. (2025). Poverty and Its Mitigation Efforts in Aceh Province during the 2020–2024 Period. Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER), 5(2), 258-265. https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v5i2.603

References

  • Achmad, W., Sidiq, S. S., & Prawira, R. Y. (2023). Analysis of the factors affecting poverty in Padasari Village. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 12(1), 189-194. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v12i1.58529
  • Fadilah, M. F., & Basuki, M. U. (2020). Analysis of factors affecting relative poverty vulnerability in West Jakarta in 2018. Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 9(2), 157-168.
  • Hamdani, N. R., Subakdi, S., Satino, S., Suprima, S., & Hidayatullah, A. (2024). Analysis of the factors causing poverty among waste collectors in Gandul Cinere. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(1), 6314-6326.
  • Info Aceh. (2024). Aceh still maintains its position as the poorest province in Sumatra. Retrieved from https://infoaceh.net/aceh/aceh-masih-pertahankan-provinsi-termiskin-di-sumatera/
  • Jaharuddin, J. (2022). Analisis Pengentasan Kemiskinan di Kota Cilegon Perspektif Model Pembangunan As-Syatibi dan Ibnu Khaldun. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 8(1), 384–396. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v8i1.4096
  • Kusumastuti, A., & Khoiron, A. M. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo (LPSP).
  • Maulana, A. A., Hidayat, T., Tuhiman, H., Kurniawati, S., & Achmad. (2020). Measurement of poverty line in Indonesia: Theoretical review and proposed improvements.
  • Nurrahmah, A., Ningsih, R. S., & Puspita, A. M. I. (2024). Tracing the roots of poverty in Indonesia: Strategies and hopes for the future. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia (JPPI), 1(4), 31-34.
  • Ogebe, O. F., Adejo, M. A., & Burbuwa, P. A. (2020). Factors affecting rural poverty and its vulnerability. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems (IJASRT in EESs), 10(2), 71-79.
  • Purwono, R., Wisnu, W., Haryanto, T., & Mubin, M. K. (2021). Poverty dynamics in Indonesia: Empirical evidence from three main approaches. World Development Perspectives, 23, 100346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100346
  • Rakhmat, R., & Fakih, F. (2019). Dynamics of poverty alleviation policy implementation in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi dan Studi Kebijakan (JIASK), 1(2), 33-38.
  • Rini, A. S., Sugiharti, L., & Universitas Airlangga. (2016). Factors determining poverty in Indonesia: Household analysis. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan, 01(2), 17-33.
  • Safarudin, R., Zulfamanna, Z., Kustati, M., & Sepriyanti, N. (2023). Qualitative research. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(2), 9680-9694.
  • Sugiharto, B., Harkim, H., Simanungkalit, R. V., Andriani, M., & Siregar, I. (2024). Socialization of the causes of poverty and barriers to economic growth among the poor in Medan Timur District. Journal of Human and Education (JAHE), 4(3), 403-407.
  • Telaumbanua, F., & Ndraha, A. B. (2023). The local government strategy in poverty alleviation post-COVID-19 pandemic: Ecological management perspective in Nias Regency. JMBI UNSRAT (Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Bisnis dan Inovasi Universitas Sam Ratulangi), 10(2), 1631-1644.
  • Wisnutama, A., Pramono, J., & Haryanto, A. T. (2023). Strategic analysis of extreme poverty alleviation programs in Madiun Regency in 2022. JI@ P, 12(2).
  • Wulandari, S., Dasopang, A. P., Rawani, G. A., Hasfizetty, I., Sofian, M. Y., Dwijaya, R., & Rachmalija, S. (2022). Anti-poverty policies: Government programs in poverty alleviation in Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 2(10), 3209-3218.
  • Zainuddin, Z., Hamdani, H., Ilyas, I., & Maryam, M. (2021). The effect of economic spending in the era of fiscal decentralization on poverty in Indonesia. Jurnal EMT KITA, 5(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.35870/emt.v5i1.257
  • Zainuddin, Z., Makmur, T., & Isthafan, N. (2018). The impact of government spending on poverty during the regional autonomy era in Indonesia. Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 9(1), 13-22. https://doi.org/DOI:10.22373/jep.v9i1.18

Author Biographies

  • Zainuddin Zainuddin, Universitas Serambi Mekkah

    Accounting Study Program, faculty of Economics, Universitas Serambi Mekkah, Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia.

  • T. Makmur, Universitas Syiah Kuala

    Agribusiness Study Program, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia.

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This is an open-access journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Under this license, you are free to:

  • Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Attribution Requirements:
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Copyright and Retention:
Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

Usage Statistics