An Analysis of the Role of Fiscal Policy in Controlling CO2 Emissions in the Industrial Sector in Indonesia

Authors

  • Viola Novaryca Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi
  • Nayla Desviona Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi
  • Lizabeth Sari Dewi Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi
  • Asramid Yasin Universitas Halu Oleo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v6i2.803

Keywords:

CO2 Emissions, Industrial Sector, Carbon Tax, Fossil Fuel Subsidies, Green Spending, Fiscal Policy

Abstract

Climate change and the growing dependence on fossil fuels have intensified the challenge of aligning Indonesia’s industrial development with its emission reduction commitments. This study analyzes the role of fiscal policy in controlling CO₂ emissions in Indonesia’s industrial sector during the period 2010–2023, with a particular focus on three fiscal instruments: carbon taxation, fossil fuel subsidies, and government expenditure on the energy and environmental sectors. Using a descriptive-analytical approach based on secondary time-series data from national greenhouse gas inventories, state budget documents, government reports, and international energy publications, this study compares the dynamics of industrial CO₂ emissions with the development of fiscal policy instruments. The findings show that industrial CO₂ emissions generally increased throughout the observation period, with a temporary decline during the COVID-19 pandemic and a sharp rebound in 2022–2023. This increase was closely associated with the expansion of energy-intensive industries and the continued reliance on coal-based energy, particularly in manufacturing and mineral processing activities. Fiscal policy has not yet provided a coherent emission-control signal. Carbon tax implementation remained limited and has not directly affected the manufacturing sector, while fossil fuel subsidies continued to create price distortions that weakened incentives for energy efficiency and renewable energy adoption. At the same time, government spending on environmental and renewable energy programs remained relatively small compared with the scale of fossil fuel subsidies. This study concludes that Indonesia’s fiscal policy still operates in two opposing directions: supporting emission reduction through carbon pricing and green expenditure, while simultaneously sustaining carbon-intensive industrial activity through energy subsidies. Strengthening fiscal coherence is therefore essential to align industrial growth with Indonesia’s low-carbon transition agenda.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Viola Novaryca, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi

    Development Economics, Business Economics and Humanities Study Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi, Jambi City, Jambi, Indonesia.

  • Nayla Desviona, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi

    Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Business and Humanities, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi, Jambi City, Jambi, Indonesia.

  • Lizabeth Sari Dewi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi

    Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Business and Humanities, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jambi, Jambi City, Jambi, Indonesia.

  • Asramid Yasin, Universitas Halu Oleo

    Environmental Science Study Program, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari City, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia.

References

Andersson, J. J. (2019). Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 11(4), 1–30.

Anggraeni, R. W. (2021). Analisis dampak kebijakan fiskal pada sektor industri dan sektor transportasi sebagai upaya penurunan emisi CO2 di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 9(2).

Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988). The theory of environmental policy (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Climate Analytics. (2024). Indonesia’s coal expansion and industrial emissions. Climate Analytics Report.

Coady, D., Parry, I., Le, N. P., & Shang, B. (2019). Global fossil fuel subsidies remain large: An update based on country-level estimates. IMF Working Paper WP/19/89.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dilasari, A. P., Ani, H. N., & Rizka, R. J. H. (2023). Analisis best practice kebijakan carbon tax dalam mengatasi eksternalitas negatif emisi karbon di Indonesia. Owner: Riset Dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 7(1), 184–194.

Friedlingstein, P., O’sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Bakker, D. C. E., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Luijkx, I. T., & Peters, G. P. (2023). Global carbon budget 2023. Earth System Science Data, 15(12), 5301–5369. https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/15/5301

IEA. (2022). Indonesia: Energy profile. International Energy Agency.

IEA. (2023). CO2 emissions in 2022. International Energy Agency.

IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press.

IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Cambridge University Press.

KEMENPERIN. (2024). Perkembangan industri manufaktur Indonesia. Kementerian Perindustrian.

Kementerian ESDM. (2020). Laporan inventarisasi emisi GRK bidang energi. Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral.

Kementerian Keuangan. (2024). Nota keuangan dan APBN 2024. Kemenkeu RI.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2022). Updated nationally determined contribution Indonesia 2022. KLHK.

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2023). Laporan inventarisasi GRK nasional 2023. KLHK.

Lin, B., & Li, X. (2011). The effect of carbon tax on per capita CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 39(9), 5137–5146.

McEachern, W. A. (2000). Economics: A contemporary introduction (5th ed.). South-Western.

Nopirin. (2000). Pengantar ilmu ekonomi makro dan mikro. BPFE.

Pamungkas, B. N., & Haptari, V. D. (2022). Analisis skema pengenaan pajak karbon di Indonesia berdasarkan United Nations Handbook mengenai penerapan pajak karbon oleh negara berkembang. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 6(2), 357–367.

Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. ILO Working Paper WP238.

Raihan, A., Muhtasim, D. A., Pavel, M. I., Faruk, O., & Rahman, M. (2022). An econometric analysis of the potential emission reduction components in Indonesia. Cleaner Production Letters, 3, 100008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2022.100008

Rais, M., & Yusuf, A. (2025). Kendala teknis dan kelembagaan implementasi pajak karbon Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Lingkungan, 6(1), 10–28.

Ratnawati, D. (2016). Carbon tax sebagai alternatif kebijakan untuk mengatasi eksternalitas negatif emisi karbon di Indonesia. Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 1(2), 53–67.

Rokhmawati, A., Sarasi, V., & Berampu, L. T. (2024). Scenario analysis of the Indonesia carbon tax impact on carbon emissions using system dynamics modeling and STIRPAT model. Geography and Sustainability, 5(4), 577–587.

Sadewo, B., Millenium, E. S., Haryanda, W. A., Wulandari, C., Bakri, S., & Febryano, I. G. (2025). Penerapan kebijakan pajak karbon di Indonesia. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Sumberdaya Dan Lingkungan, 14(1), 41–48.

Siregar, S., Fatah, L., Imansyah, M. H., & Sunardi, S. (2025). Indonesia’s carbon tax: To what extent is it effective in achieving the goals? Indonesian Treasury Review: Jurnal Perbendaharaan, Keuangan Negara Dan Kebijakan Publik, 10(2).

Wibowo, R. J. A. (2023). Tinjauan kebijakan hukum insentif perpajakan pada sektor energi dan transportasi untuk mendukung net zero emission tahun 2060 di Indonesia. Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 7(1), 91–107.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Novaryca, V., Desviona, N., Dewi, L. S., & Yasin, A. (2026). An Analysis of the Role of Fiscal Policy in Controlling CO2 Emissions in the Industrial Sector in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER), 6(2), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v6i2.803

Similar Articles

1-10 of 70

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.