Articles

Asymmetric Impact of Public Service Digitalization on Local Economic Productivity Transformation in Rural Indonesia

Mutiara Shifa, Sri Maryanti, Dian Ariani, Ngurah Pandji Mertua Agung Durya, Sugeng Karyadi

View Author Affiliations
  • Mutiara Shifa: Universitas Teuku Umar., Indonesia
  • Sri Maryanti: Universitas Lancang Kuning., Indonesia
  • Dian Ariani: Universitas Teuku Umar., Indonesia
  • Ngurah Pandji Mertua Agung Durya: Universitas Dian Nuswantoro., Indonesia
  • Sugeng Karyadi: Universitas Lambung Mangkurat., Indonesia
Published:
June 28, 2026
Pages:
380–387

Views

0

Views

Downloads

0

Downloads

Article Metrics


Share Article:

Abstract

This study examines the asymmetric impact of public service digitalization on the transformation of local economic productivity in rural areas of Indonesia. Digitalization of public services is expected to improve efficiency, accessibility, and transparency; however, its benefits are not always evenly distributed across regions and communities. Using a quantitative approach, this research analyzes how variations in digital access, digital service utilization, institutional capacity, and human capital shape local economic productivity outcomes. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire from 100 respondents representing rural micro-entrepreneurs, community leaders, and local public service users. Data were analyzed using SPSS with multiple linear regression techniques. The results indicate that public service digitalization has a significant positive effect on local economic productivity, but the magnitude of its impact differs depending on digital literacy levels and infrastructure readiness. Digital access and service utilization significantly enhance productivity, while institutional capacity strengthens the effectiveness of digital transformation. Conversely, limited human capital creates an asymmetric effect, constraining productivity gains in less-prepared rural areas. Simultaneous testing confirms that all independent variables collectively influence local economic productivity. These findings highlight that digital transformation in rural public services must be accompanied by inclusive capacity-building policies to avoid widening productivity gaps. The study contributes to the literature on digital governance and rural economic development by providing empirical evidence from a developing country context.

Author Biographies
Mutiara Shifa

Universitas Teuku Umar.

Development Economics Study Program, Universitas Teuku Umar, West Aceh Regency, Aceh Province, Indonesia.

Sri Maryanti

Universitas Lancang Kuning.

Management Study Program, Faculty of Economics, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Pekanbaru City, Riau Province, Indonesia.

Dian Ariani

Universitas Teuku Umar.

Development Economics Study Program, Universitas Teuku Umar, West Aceh Regency, Aceh Province, Indonesia.

Ngurah Pandji Mertua Agung Durya

Universitas Dian Nuswantoro.

Universitas Dian Nuswantoro, Semarang City, Central Java Province, Indonesia.

Sugeng Karyadi

Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.

Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin City, South Kalimantan Province Jakarta, Indonesia.

Article Identifiers
  • Article Title: Asymmetric Impact of Public Service Digitalization on Local Economic Productivity Transformation in Rural Indonesia
  • DOI: 10.59431/ijer.v6i2.769
  • Publication Date: 2026-06-28
  • Journal: Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER)
  • Volume: 6
  • Issue: 2
  • Pages: 380–387
References
  • Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2020). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(1), 3–30. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Autor, D. H. (2019). Work of the future. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109, 1–32. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2016). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Dahlman, C. (2020). Technology, development, and the future of work. World Bank Research Observer, 35(2), 217–242. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Fountain, J. E. (2016). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Heeks, R. (2018). Information and communication technology for development (ICT4D). Routledge. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Kemp, S. (2021). Digital adoption and internet use in Southeast Asia. DataReportal. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Kitchin, R. (2019). The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Geography Compass, 13(3), e12417. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2017). Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and e-government. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • OECD. (2020). Digital government review: Enhancing the digital transformation of the public sector. OECD Publishing. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Reddick, C. G. (2016). Public administration and information technology. Public Administration Review, 76(1), 145–156. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Schwab, K. (2017). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • UNDP. (2019). Digital transformation in public services. United Nations Development Programme. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. MIS Quarterly, 43(1), 223–251. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • West, D. M. (2018). Digital government: Technology and public sector performance. Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers
  • World Bank. (2016). World development report 2016: Digital dividends. World Bank Publications. Google Scholar Scite Semantic Scholar Scilit Crossref Connected Papers

Issue Information

Article Details

Volume: 6
Issue: 2
Year: 2026
Published: 2026-06-28
Pages: 380–387
Section: Articles
View Full Issue
Additional Information

How to Cite

Shifa, M., Maryanti, S., Ariani, D., Durya, N. P. M. A., & Karyadi, S. (2026). Asymmetric Impact of Public Service Digitalization on Local Economic Productivity Transformation in Rural Indonesia. Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER), 6(2), 380–387. https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v6i2.769
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

img
img
img
img
img
Our News & Similar Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
Author Publications

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Discover more articles by the same author(s)