The Influence of Perceived Usefulness on QRIS Technology Adoption in Mobile Banking Applications Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59431/jmasif.v5i2.1029

Keywords:

QRIS, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Perceived Usefulness, Technology Adoption, Mobile Banking

Abstract

The integration of the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) into mobile banking applications has reshaped retail payment behaviors in Indonesia. Grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study examines the predictive effect of perceived usefulness on QRIS technology adoption among active mobile banking users. A quantitative explanatory survey was conducted with 100 verified respondents in the Jakarta Metropolitan Area, recruited using purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using simple linear regression after conducting psychometric and classical assumption diagnostics. The results show that perceived usefulness has a statistically significant positive effect on QRIS adoption (β = 0.766, p < 0.001), explaining 58.7% of the variance (R² = 0.587). In this study, perceived usefulness captures cognitive expectations related to transaction speed, operational efficiency, and practical advantages, while technology adoption reflects sustained behavioral reliance, recurrent use, and satisfaction in everyday transactions. These findings support TAM in financial technology contexts and imply that commercial banks and payment system engineers should prioritize low-latency scanning, seamless biometric authorization, and reliable transaction settlement to sustain adoption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Seven Kurniawan Gea, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

    Program Studi Teknologi Informasi, Fakultas Teknik dan Informatika, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Mochammad Abdul Azis, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

    Program Studi Teknologi Informasi, Fakultas Teknik dan Informatika, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Ahmad Fauzi, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

    Program Studi Sistem Informasi Akuntansi, Fakultas Teknik dan Informatika, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.

  • Ginabila Ginabila, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika

    Program Studi Sistem Informasi, Fakultas Teknik dan Informatika, Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika, Kota Jakarta Pusat, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta, Indonesia.

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Al-Sharafi, M. A., Al-Qaysi, N., Iahad, N., & Al-Emran, M. (2022). A systematic review of mobile payment acceptance: A synthesized framework and future research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102878.

Bella Fajar Indah. (2025). Pengaruh literasi keuangan, gaya hidup dan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) terhadap minat penggunaan Quick Response Indonesia Standard (QRIS) pada pengunjung kedai kopi Sha'ring di Karanganyar. Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921.

Daragmeh, A., Lentner, C., & Sági, J. (2021). FinTech payments in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the continuous intention to use. Sustainability, 13(19), 11014. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131911014.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.

Ekaputra, P. S., Ciptosari, F., & Halim, T. (2024). Adopsi teknologi pembayaran digital QRIS di kalangan UMKM Labuan Bajo: Tantangan dan peluang. Jurnal Akademisi Vokasi, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.63604/javok.v3i2.138.

Galih Nur Jati, A., Margono, F. P., Ardiyono, T. A., & Wulansari, A. (2023). Analisis faktor tingkat kepercayaan penggunaan QRIS pada UMKM di Surabaya menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi (DJTechno), 4(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.46576/djtechno.v4i1.3412.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Jannah, M., Hasyim, F., & Sari, L. E. P. (2023). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan penggunaan QRIS pada generasi milenial Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Quranomic: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 2(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.37252/jebi.v2i2.374.

Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Molinillo, S., & Japutra, A. (2020). Predicting the intention to use mobile payment technologies: The role of mobile usefulness, security and ease of use. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 45, 101024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101024.

Mustofa, R. H., & Maula, P. I. (2023). Factors influencing the adoption of QRIS use (Faktor yang berpengaruh pada adopsi penggunaan QRIS). Management Studies and Entrepreneurship Journal (MSEJ), 4(5), 6714–6726.

Najib, M., & Fahma, F. (2020). Investigating the adoption of digital payment system through an extended technology acceptance model: An insight from the Indonesian small and medium enterprises. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10(4), 1702–1708. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.10.4.11616.

Patil, P. P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Raghavan, V. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144.

Rahmawati, A., & Murtanto. (2023). Pengaruh persepsi manfaat dan persepsi kemudahan penggunaan uang elektronik (QRIS) pada mahasiswa akuntansi. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 3(1), 1247–1256. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v3i1.16032.

Ramadanti, S. N., Agustina, R., & Gustiana, R. (2025). Pengaruh persepsi manfaat, kemudahan dan kepercayaan terhadap minat penggunaan QRIS. Dinamika Ekonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 18(1), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.53651/jdeb.v18i1.584.

Rejeki, R. S., & Astuti, P. B. (2024). Pengaruh persepsi manfaat, persepsi kemudahan penggunaan, dan persepsi risiko terhadap keputusan menggunakan Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) di Kebumen. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 4(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.55606/jimbi.v4i1.3021.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Sahabuddin, R., Azhari, A., Putri, A. A., Salsabila, E. M., Annisah, S., & Ayu, R. M. (2025). Pengaruh manfaat dan kemudahan penggunaan QRIS terhadap minat pengguna di kalangan Gen Z melalui kepuasan pelanggan. Jurnal Rumpun Manajemen dan Ekonomi, 2(3), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.61132/jrme.v2i3.1002.

Saripudin, S., Yuniarti, R., & Ernawati, D. (2023). Exploring the factors influencing the adoption of QRIS as a digital payment in Indonesia. The Journal of Management Theory and Practice, 4(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.37231/jmtp.2023.4.1.322.

Sivathanu, B. (2019). Adoption of digital payment systems in the era of demonetization in India: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior, 96, 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.026.

Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Upadhyay, N., Upadhyay, S., Abed, S. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). Consumer adoption of mobile payment services during COVID-19: Extending meta-UTAUT with perceived severity and self-efficacy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121638.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540.

Wicaksono, S. R. (2022). Teori dasar Technology Acceptance Model. Seribu Bintang.

Wijaya, M. L. (2024). Pengaruh persepsi manfaat dan kemudahan terhadap efisiensi pembayaran digital menggunakan Quick Response Code Indonesia Standard (QRIS). Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen, 3(2), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.55606/jpim.v3i2.2854.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-10

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gea, S. K., Azis, M. A., Fauzi, A., & Ginabila, G. (2026). The Influence of Perceived Usefulness on QRIS Technology Adoption in Mobile Banking Applications Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Manajemen Sistem Informasi (JMASIF), 5(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.59431/jmasif.v5i2.1029

Similar Articles

11-20 of 25

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.