Skip to main content
Articles

Comparative Analysis of Windows and Linux Operating Systems for Secondary School Laboratories: A Limited Systematic Literature Review

  • 1,2* Universitas Ibrahimy

* Corresponding Author: Aisyah Putri Sabrina

Open Access
Published
Pages
52–59

Abstract

Operating systems determine the day-to-day sustainability of school computer labs — particularly when institutions face licensing budget constraints, varying device specifications, and basic security requirements. This article is structured as a limited systematic literature review comparing Windows and Linux in an educational context, without claiming to be a primary benchmark experiment. The methodology follows PRISMA 2020 and Kitchenham systematic literature review guidelines, covering research question formulation, literature search, inclusion-exclusion criteria-based selection, quality assessment, and thematic synthesis. From an initial pool of 68 records, 10 relevant and traceable sources were used as the basis for synthesis across five core dimensions: licensing cost, hardware requirements, application compatibility, security, and user readiness. The findings indicate that while Linux presents strict user privilege execution layers and zero direct licensing overhead, Windows demonstrates superior native compatibility with proprietary national examination client browsers and a shorter learning curve due to established user familiarity. This article contributes a multi-criteria decision matrix for educational labs that balances operational constraints against technical efficiency.

Keywords

How to Cite

Fatah, Z., & Sabrina, A. P. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Windows and Linux Operating Systems for Secondary School Laboratories: A Limited Systematic Literature Review. Journal Dekstop Application (JDA), 5(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.59431/jda.v5i1.874

References

  • Alhothail, B., Alshimer, M., Alotaibi, S., & Nagy, N. (2023). Comparison between Windows and Linux operating system by analyzing the related security features. International Journal of Computer Science and Cybersecurity, 12(2), 74–83.
  • Canonical. (2024). Install Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS. Ubuntu Documentation. https://documentation.ubuntu.com/desktop/en/24.04/tutorial/install-ubuntu-desktop/
  • Canonical Community Help Wiki. (2024). Installation/SystemRequirements. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements
  • Chen, Y., & Li, Z. (2023). Performance analysis of Linux and Windows operating systems for personal computing. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications, 35(2), 105–120.
  • Fitriani, A., & Utomo, B. (2023). Analisis Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) migrasi sistem operasi open source di lingkungan pendidikan menengah. Jurnal Edukasi dan Teknologi Informatika, 7(2), 88–95.
  • Hidayat, R., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Optimalisasi laboratorium komputer sekolah menggunakan distribusi Linux ringan pada perangkat keras usang. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Rekayasa Komputer, 4(1), 34–42.
  • Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01). Keele University.
  • Linux Mint Project. (2025). Linux Mint installation guide: System requirements. https://linuxmint-installation-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/
  • Microsoft. (2025a). Windows 11 requirements. Microsoft Learn. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/whats-new/windows-11-requirements
  • Microsoft. (2025b). Windows 11 specifications and system requirements. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/windows-11-specifications
  • Microsoft Security. (2025). Cyberthreats, viruses, and malware. Microsoft Security Intelligence. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/wdsi/threats
  • Myers, A., & Singh, P. (2023). Windows vs Linux: A comprehensive comparison of resource efficiency and system performance. Journal of Operating Systems Research, 22(3), 45–59.
  • National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Guidelines for managing the security of mobile devices in the enterprise (NIST Special Publication 800-124 Rev. 2). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-124r2
  • Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  • Patel, D., & Desai, R. (2024). Exploring the user experience differences between Windows and Linux: A case study for personal use. Journal of Information Technology, 29(4), 231–240.
  • Pratama, M. A., & Kurniawan, D. (2023). Analisis komparatif performa throughput memori dan penjadwalan CPU: Windows vs Linux. Jurnal Riset Sistem Komputer dan Informatika, 5(3), 112–121.
  • Ramadhan, F., & Wijaya, S. (2024). Studi komparasi arsitektur keamanan kernel terhadap infeksi malware pada laboratorium komputer publik. Jurnal Keamanan Siber dan Sistem Informasi, 3(2), 45–53.
  • Shidqin, L. H. M., Hidayat, T., & Fatah, Z. (2025). Pelatihan instalasi sistem operasi Linux Mint di VirtualBox pada siswa TKJ SMK Ibrahimy 1 Sukorejo. JUAN: Jurnal Pengabdian Nusantara, 2(3), 76–84.
  • Suryadi, E., & Lestari, P. (2025). Analisis usabilitas dan kurva pembelajaran antarmuka grafis sistem operasi alternatif bagi pengguna awam di sekolah. Jurnal Penyelidikan Teknologi Pendidikan, 8(1), 15–24.
  • Williams, S., & Patel, D. (2021). Thread-level parallelism in Windows and Linux. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 32(12), e6021. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.6021

Author Biographies

  • Zaehol Fatah, Universitas Ibrahimy

    Universitas Ibrahimy, Situbondo Regency, East Java Province, Indonesia

  • Aisyah Putri Sabrina, Universitas Ibrahimy

    Universitas Ibrahimy, Situbondo Regency, East Java Province, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Zaehol Fatah, Aisyah Putri Sabrina

This is an open-access journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Under this license, you are free to:

  • Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Attribution Requirements:
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Copyright and Retention:
Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

Usage Statistics