Marketing Mix Strategy On Marketing Performance And Company Performance In The Business Environment As Moderating Variables (Study on: Small and Medium Seaweed Industry Players in Bontang City)

M Risal

doi:10.59431/ijer.v5i2.613

Quick Links

Journal

Home: Journal Home
Current: Current Issue
Archives: All Issues
News: Announcements
Search: Search Articles

About

About: About Journal
Team: Editorial Team
Reviewers: Reviewer Team
Indexing: Indexed In

For Authors

Guidelines: Author Guidelines
Submit: Submit Article
Fees: Publication Fees

Policies

Ethics: Publication Ethics
Review: Reviewer Guide
Access: Open Access
Contact: Contact Us

6281260272238
alam.amiki@gmail.com
Mon - Sat: 08:00 - 15:00

Articles

PDF

Articles

Marketing Mix Strategy On Marketing Performance And Company Performance In The Business Environment As Moderating Variables (Study on: Small and Medium Seaweed Industry Players in Bontang City)

M Risal

View Author Affiliations

M Risal: Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v5i2.613

Published:

October 10, 2025

Pages:

187-197

355

Views

194

Downloads

Article Metrics

Abstract

This study examines marketing strategies that include the implementation of marketing performance and company performance that moderates external environment. In this study, which includes the application of marketing strategies which include product strategies, price strategies, distribution strategies, promotion strategies, (4Ps), while marketing performance includes adaptation, effectiveness, and efficiency, company performance includes technological innovation, marketing capabilities, and financial performance while environmental moderation includes competition between industries, the threat of foreign industry entry, and supplier bargaining power. The type of research used is a descriptive method and uses a causality method using path analysis. The number of populations and samples was used by survey methods and cluster proportional sampling methods. Data was collected from the population of 9 small and medium industries with a total of 115 employees. The results of the test were carried out using Partial Least Square (PLS), the results of each variable were measured, namely; marketing strategy 0.275 with the medium category, the competition environment variable 0.400 with the strong category, while the company performance variable 0, was categorized as weak. Furthermore, the relationship between marketing strategy and marketing performance has a positive and significant influence with a value of 0.846 and a P-Value of 0.000, the relationship between marketing strategy and company performance has a positive and significant influence with a value of 0.846 and a P-Value of 0.002, the relationship between marketing performance and company performance does not have a positive but significant influence with a value of 0.203 and a P-Value of 0.141 on MSMEs and SMEs in the seaweed industry in Bontang City.

Keywords

Marketing Strategy; Marketing Performance; Company Performance; Competitive Environment

Author Biographies

M Risal

Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur

Faculty of Economic, Business and Politic, Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur, Samarinda, Indonesia.

Article Identifiers

Article Title: Marketing Mix Strategy On Marketing Performance And Company Performance In The Business Environment As Moderating Variables (Study on: Small and Medium Seaweed Industry Players in Bontang City)
DOI: 10.59431/ijer.v5i2.613
Publication Date: 2025-10-10

Journal: Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER)
Volume: 5
Issue: 2
Pages: 187-197

References

Aminnudin, M. (2014). Upaya peningkatan kinerja pemasaran dengan faktor lingkungan sebagai variabel moderat. 11(2), 199–212.
Angell, L. C., & Klassen, R. D. (1999). Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: An agenda for research in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 17(1), 575–598.
Arumsari, N. R., & Marka, M. M. (2018). Strategy competitive advantages through marketing performance. Journal of Business and Economics, 22(2), 168–185.
Barney, J. B., & Hesterly, W. (2019). Strategic management and competitive advantage (L. Albelli, Ed.; 6th ed.). Pearson.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (2012). The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management, 42(5), 488–506.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (H. Salmon, Ed.; 8th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Fahy, J., & Smithee, A. (1999). Strategic marketing and the resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1999(10).
Gabrielsson, M., Seppala, T., & Gabrielsson, P. (2016). Realizing a hybrid competitive strategy and achieving superior financial performance while internationalizing in the high-technology market. Industrial Marketing Management, 54, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.07.001
Ghasemi, I., & Yaghmaei, O. (2015). Effects of competitive advantage on companies' superiority in the global market. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 57(December), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ilshs.57.65
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
Hidayat, C., Putong, I., & Sari, R. K. (2014a). Interdependensi strategi pemasaran terhadap kinerja perusahaan (suatu penelitian pada perusahaan asuransi Indonesia yang sudah go public). 5(1), 18–27.
Hidayat, C., Putong, I., & Sari, R. K. (2014b). Interdependensi strategi pemasaran terhadap kinerja perusahaan (suatu penelitian pada perusahaan asuransi Indonesia yang sudah go public). Binus Business Review, 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.21512/bbr.v5i1.1192
Huber, F., Meyer, F., Vogel, J., & Vollmann, S. (2011). Corporate social performance as antecedent of consumers' brand perception. Journal of Brand Management, 19(3), 228–240. https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2011.37
Hughes, J., Kornberger, M., Mackay, B., O’Brien, P., & Reddy, S. (2021). Organizational strategy and its implications for strategic studies: A review essay. Journal of Strategic Studies, 00(00), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2021.1994950
Julian, C. C. (2014). Examining firm and environmental influences on export marketing mix strategy and export performance of Australian exporters. European Journal of Marketing, 1. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310459005
Jusoh, R., & Parnell, J. A. (2008). Competitive strategy and performance measurement in the Malaysian context: An exploratory study. Management Decision, 46(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810846716
Kickul, J. R. (2009). Innovation: An empirical examination of internet firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 263–286.
Koksal, M. H., & Ozgul, E. (2007). The relationship between marketing strategies and performance in an economic crisis. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(11). https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500710754574
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2017). Principles of marketing (D. Luiz, Ed.; 17th ed.). Global Edition.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management: Global edition (S. Wall, Ed.; 15th ed., Vol. 15E). Pearson Global Edition. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911760903022556
Listyarso, A. (2005). Lingkungan persaingan sebagai (Master’s thesis). Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Mayfield, M., Mayfield, J., & Walker, R. (2020). Fundamental theories of business communication. Laying a foundation for the field.
Miller, C. C., & Cardinal, L. B. (1994). Strategic planning and firm performance: A synthesis of more than two decades of research. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1649–1665. https://doi.org/10.2307/256804
Mintzberg, H. (1987). The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review, 11–24.
Morgan, N. A., Clark, B. H., & Gooner, R. (2002). Marketing productivity, marketing audits, and systems for marketing performance assessment: Integrating multiple perspectives. Journal of Business Research, 55(5), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00162-4
Nadra, I. (2020). Analisis pengaruh strategi pemasaran dimasa pandemi COVID-19 terhadap peningkatan kinerja UMKM Kota Medan dimoderasi oleh teknologi (Master’s thesis). Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara.
O’Regan, N., & Ghobadian, A. (2005). Innovation in SMEs: The impact of strategic orientation and environmental perceptions. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 54(2), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400510576595
Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance (Vol. 18, Issue 2, p. 580). The Free Press.
Ratih Kumala, A. J. (2020). Strategi bisnis dan pemanfaatan kebijakan pajak di masa pandemi COVID-19 dan era new normal (studi kasus pelaku UKM marketplace). 2017(1), 1–9.
Reinecke, S. (2003). Marketing performance management.
Rianto, S., & Banin, Q. A. B. (2014). Pengaruh kemitraan dan kewirausahaan terhadap saluran distribusi, serta pengaruhnya terhadap kinerja usaha UMKM di Kabupaten Brebes. Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, 1(1), 324–333.
Risal, M., & Aqsa, M. (2019). The effect of marketing strategy 7P on company performance in PT. Telkom branch Palopo. Jurnal Manajemen, Bisnis dan Organisasi, 3(3), 120–129.
Rust, R. R., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68(7), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.109.24030
Salavou, H. E. (2015). Competitive strategies and their shift to the future. European Business Review, 27(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-04-2013-0073
Secundo, G., Elia, G., & Passiante, G. (2017). Pathways towards the entrepreneurial university for creating entrepreneurial engineers: An Italian case. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 21(1/2), 27. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijeim.2017.10002349
Silvestro, R. (2014). Performance topology mapping: Understanding the drivers of performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 156(October 2014), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.011
Soegiastuti, J., & Haryanti, C. S. (2013). Model kinerja pemasaran usaha kecil dan menengah (UKM) di Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Ilmiah Dinamika Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 1(1), 56–68.
Soetan, O. B. O., & R. O. (2018). Competition, corporate governance, and corporate performance. The Electronic Library, 34(1), 1–5.
Sukarno, G. (2011). Meningkatkan kinerja pemasaran UMKM melalui peran lingkungan, inovasi produk, dan kreativitas strategi pemasaran. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan), 15(3), 332. https://doi.org/10.24034/j25485024.y2011.v15.i3.2298
Teller, C., Kotzab, H., Grant, D. B., & Holweg, C. (2016). The importance of key supplier relationship management in supply chains. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 44(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-05-2015-0072
Tosi, H. L., & Slocum, J. W. (1984). Contingency theory: Some suggested directions. Journal of Management, 10(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638401000103
Tuanmat, T. Z., & Smith, M. (2011). The effects of changes in competition, technology, and strategy on organizational performance in small and medium manufacturing companies. Asian Review of Accounting, 19(3), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217341111185137
Tunbosun, L. A. (2012). Exploring marketing strategy as a catalyst for performance in Nigerian telecommunication industry. International Journal of Management & Business Studies, 2(4), 65–75.
Vij, S., & Bedi, H. S. (2016). Are subjective business performance measures justified? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(5), 603–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2014-0196
Wanda, E., Maulidar, & Hijriatih, M. (2024). Analysis of digital marketing strategies in MSMEs in Banda Aceh to increase competitiveness in the post-pandemic era. Indonesian Journal of Economic Review, 4(2), 42–49. https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v4i2.424
Wheelen, T. L., Hunger, J. D., Hoffman, A. N., & Bamford, C. E. (2011). Strategic management and business policy (S. Ukil, Ed.; 14th ed.). Pearson.

Issue Information

Article Details

Volume:	5
Issue:	2
Year:	2025
Published:	2025-10-10
Pages:	187-197
Section:	Articles

View Full Issue

Additional Information

How to Cite

M Risal. (2025). Marketing Mix Strategy On Marketing Performance And Company Performance In The Business Environment As Moderating Variables (Study on: Small and Medium Seaweed Industry Players in Bontang City). Indonesian Journal Economic Review (IJER), 5(2), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.59431/ijer.v5i2.613